Corporate Law • Case Briefs • Jul 19, 2026 Pitambar Prasad Acharya and Others v. Ministry of Finance and Others Court: Supreme Court of Nepal, Joint Bench Decision Date:2070/09/03 Petitioner: Pitambar Prasad Acharya (Founder Chairman and Executive Director), on behalf of Development Project Service Center (DEPROSC Nepal) &ndash… By Mimamsha
International Law • Case Briefs • Jul 19, 2026 Salikram Sapkota on behalf of Narayan Sapkota v. Primsa Dawadi Case No.: 077-CI-0389 Decided By: Supreme Court, Joint Bench Honorable Justice Mr. Hariprasad Phuyal Honorable Justice Mr. Nripadhwaj Niraula Original Court Decision: Court: Nawalpur District Court Judge: Hon. District Judge Mr. Vi… By Mimamsha
Constitutional Law • Case Briefs • Jul 15, 2026 Mithilesh Kumar Singh et al. v. Prime Minister et al., N.K.P. 2055 Facts of the Case Following the promulgation of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal, 2047 (1990), Parliament enacted the 'Labour Act, 2048 (1992)' and the executive framed the 'Labour Rules, 2050 (1993)'. The Constitution, un… By Mimamsha
Constitutional Law • Case Briefs • Jul 14, 2026 Rabindra Bhattarai vs. Council of Ministers N.K.P. 2055 Facts of the Case The Parliament enacted the "Torture Compensation Act, 2053 (1996)" to criminalize torture and provide compensation to victims, aligning domestic law with the UN Convention Against Torture (UNCAT). 'Section 10'&… By Mimamsha
Judicial Activism • Case Briefs • Jul 03, 2026 Could Financial scarcity be the valid ground to quash the PIL related to right to life: Case review of Roshan Auji v. Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport et al. Writ No. 082-WO-0092 | Decision No. 53 Patan High Court, Joint Bench (Bench No. 4) Hon. Justice Suryanath Prakash Adhikari & Hon. Justice Tejendraprasad Sharma Sapkota Date of Decision: Ashoj 22, 2082 B.S. (October 2025) I. ABSTRACT Thi… By Roshan Auji
Labour Law • Case Briefs • Feb 21, 2026 Cases Related to Right to Employment Background Right to employment is one of the important fundamental rights as well as one of the important sources of livelihood and income generation. It emphasizes the concept of "decent work," which includes the right to fair wages, saf… By Supreeya Pandey
Election Law • Case Briefs • Dec 13, 2025 Communist Party of Nepal v. Election Commission Introduction The case of Communist Party of Nepal v. Election Commission (NKP 2051, Decision No. 4950) started from a writ petition filed before the Supreme Court of Nepal challenging the refusal of the Election Commission to register a polit… By Abhiruchee Lamsal
Constitutional Law • Case Briefs • Dec 12, 2025 Mihir Kumar Thakur & Others vs. Election Commission Introduction Decision Number: 7541 Decided Date: 2062/05/15 Case Type: Mandamus Bench: Joint Bench (Shushila Karki and Bharatraj Upretee) I. Facts of the case and Procedural History This writ petition was filed amidst concerns over the poor fi… By Durga Prasad Khanal
Constitutional Law • Case Briefs • Sep 19, 2025 Advocate Dr. Chandrakant Gyawali v. Office of the President and others Introduction of the Case This case was heard by the Supreme Court of Nepal, Constitutional Bench in 069-WO-0976. The petitioners were Advocate Dr. Chandrakant Gyawali, former President of the Constitutional Lawyers’ Forum (CLAF), a permanent … By Abhiruchee Lamsal
Evidence Law • Case Briefs • Aug 01, 2025 Saroj BC et.al vs Government of Nepal : A Case Review From the Perspective of Evidence Law BACKGROUND Plaintiff: Government of Nepal on behalf of Rukum 11 Defendants: Syane alias Saroj BC and Chankhe alias Ajeeb Sunar, Dal Bahadur Dangi, Tej Kumar B.K, Hari Khadka Appellants: Saroj BC and Ajeeb Sunar Case: Rape Case No. 073-CR-1679, … By Sujina Dhoju